El grupo al cual envías entradas es un grupo Usenet. Si envías mensajes a este grupo, cualquier usuario de Internet podrá ver tu dirección de correo electrónico
I just got this reply from Amazon (IPs in header indicate that it really came via Amazon)
| Received: from mm-notify-out-1102.amazon.com ([207.171.164.40]) | by vmx1.spamcop.net with ESMTP; 05 Nov 2009 23:40:06 -0800
to a Spamcop complaint, which says:
| The URL that SpamCop is telling us to be spam, isn't spam. | | We have taken actions to change the way that we are sending mails from the hornymatches.ws site.
Hornymatches is a well known porn spammer, using other than a WS domain usually. It's kind of stunning for me that Amazon. Am I just naive not to know and be surprised that Amazon hosts spammer (and defends them)? Or did I make a mistake interpreting the header?
| If you think the matter isn't closed on your behalf, you can contact me.
I might do that after some feedback here. Depending on the public's opinion, if Amazon is a black hat now. I don't like to see big well known companies to host spammers.
-- Andreas (PGP Key available on public key servers) You know you're a Redneck when 31. You've used your ironing board as a buffet table.
In <4AF43A82.4090...@usenet.ankman.de>, on 11/06/2009 at 10:02 AM, Andreas Kohlbach <a...@spamfence.net> said:
>to a Spamcop complaint, which says: >| The URL that SpamCop is telling us to be spam, isn't spam.
I'm quite certain that SpamCop told spamazon that the URL was advertised via spam, not that the URL itself was spam, and they have more credibility than amazon. For some reason I was reminded of a figure from the distant past named Keman.
>Hornymatches is a well known porn spammer, using other than a WS domain >usually. It's kind of stunning for me that Amazon. Am I just naive not to >know and be surprised that Amazon hosts spammer (and defends them)?
Yes. Google for "spamazon".
>I might do that after some feedback here. Depending on the public's >opinion, if Amazon is a black hat now.
They certainly were in the past. Who knows, maybe the horse has learned to sing?
I reserve the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not reply to spamt...@library.lspace.org
>I just got this reply from Amazon (IPs in header indicate that it really > came via Amazon)
...
> I might do that after some feedback here. Depending on the public's > opinion, if Amazon is a black hat now. I don't like to see big well > known companies to host spammers.
....
Godaddy "doesn't spam either" yet somehow dotster, moniker 1&1 and godaddy always turn up in adultfsckfinder related registrations. Surptisingly the suppression lists seem to leak or age me off periodically, or someone think that abusing yahoo or giggle groups landing pages leaves them with clean hands.
Why are you surprised? Amazon is an empire partly built on spam.
Andreas Kohlbach wrote: > Godaddy is just a hoster (spam loving though), while Amazon is one of the > e-commerce pioneers of the internet. It's like Apple or Microsoft would > actively host or do service for third party spammers. Like Amazon seems > to do.
|
